2 Comments
User's avatar
Joe's avatar

Imagine you become the ruler of a country.

And your most imperative goal is to fill it with foreigners as fast as possible.

With the end goal of ensuring the current majority population becomes a minority before the century is done.

What would you assume motivates such a leader?

Expand full comment
Joe's avatar

People who hate the west like the idea of mass immigration into it, because they see it as a type of revenge.

"Conquer the world, invite the world" they say - which is entirely illogical and easily disproven by the existence of Japan, but let us continue.

They are resentful and feel like they are owed something. And they think if they can come to our lands and outbreed us and takeover, then they can "get the wealth back" and take over our systems, infrastructure etc and enjoy the high quality of life we have without having to deal with or compete with us.

They think what we enjoy is the byproduct of "what we stole" and is rightfully theirs, delusional to the reality that access to resources alone does not determine the prosperity of a country, but the quality of its people - their intelligence, their moral integrity, their civility and robustness - and good, effective governance that minimises corruption all have a much greater role to play. They disregard the role genetics plays, and think everything comes down to geography and natural resources, which is wrong - because by this logic, as blessed with resources as it is, the African continent would be the most dominant rather than the most conquered.

Dumping a bunch of gold bars or oil barrels or a continuous supply of lithium or cobalt into the middle of a capital city (which wouldn't even have use for the last 3 things unless it had reached a level of technology necessary to extract and make proper use of them) doesn't suddenly make a country prosperous, cultured or well run.

Their idiocy and hubris is they think they can take over our societies, and then maintain them at the level that they are but without us in them. But they cannot. If we disappear, so does our civilization with us. If they get their wish "in wiping us out" and "taking over" they will simply regress the society to something more approximate of their heritage society. Because not only are they incapable of building what we've built, they likewise cannot even maintain it once the hard work of building it to begin with has been done for them.

Look no further than to South Africa for a vibrant example of this, which was highly developed under apartheid, and since ruled by the ANC for the past couple of decades have been declining due to corruption and idiotic policy choices like a 50/50 black-white quota in highly skill jobs, when there aren't enough blacks to hit the quota and an excess of whites who do but won't be given a place and are thus forced to emigrate - pushing out high tax paying talent the country urgently needs to maintain its infrastructure because that talent does not have the correct skin colour.

That country which the Bantu inherited has had rolling blackouts for at least a decade now, because the ruling elite there never bothered to upgrade the capacity since the apartheid era despite being warned multiple times ahead of time that the infrastructure would fail if they did nothing. Also millions of dollars routinely disappears from Eskom, that should've been earmarked for infrastructure projects that would allow the power to stay on. All the power outages harm the country's economic productivity, and lead to rising crime, and as the state falls apart people must rely on private security and back up generators - delegating functions of the state to the private sector - because the state is woefully inadequate, corrupt and ineffective at governing the nation it inherited.

If the people who hate us and want we have got their way, the west would be little more than a collection of South Africa's - but they aren't capable of having that conversation.

Expand full comment